64 Audio U12t | Balanced Armature Universal IEMs-Bloom Audio
64 Audio U12t | Balanced Armature Universal IEMs-Bloom Audio
64 Audio U12t | Endgame Balanced Armature Earphones-Bloom Audio
64 Audio U12t | Balanced Armature Universal IEMs-Bloom Audio

64 Audio U12t (Latest Revision) | Balanced Armature Universal IEMs

Sale price$1,999.00
/

Condition
Our Take

For us, being able to hear all kinds of new high end gear all the time from our great brand partners...it's easy to get jaded. "Oh this new headphone will change everything!" "This DAC is finally going to make you feel like digital music is perfect!" "This cable has gold infused adamantium...now you'll REALLY hear the music as the artist intended!" Hype and marketing hyperbole sucks. But every once in a while, an audio product comes along that truly feels...perfect. Perfect not in that nothing can possibly be better than it. But perfect in that it delivers such a remarkably perfect tonality and timbre in its price range, that you just know it's a triumph. Ladies and gentlemen, the U12t is a masterpiece. If you're looking to invest two large on IEMs, the U12t absolutely must be on your short list. Our highest, highest recommendation.

Read the full review.

From 64 Audio

The U12t does it all, delivering immersive sound and impeccable spatial imaging. It's clean highs extend beautifully with a warm and engaging low-end response - just like its custom counterpart, the A12t. Offering reference-level detail, this IEM is among the best for multi-instrumentalists, engineers, sound monitors, and audiophiles.

Each ergonomic shell is machined out of a solid piece of aluminum and finished with an elegant brushed aluminum faceplate.

64 Audio U12t

Technology

U12t features the following unique technology:

Tia

The tia system is comprised of three major elements: open balanced armature tia drivers, the tia single-bore design, and tia acoustic chambers. All our Custom In-Ear Monitors with tia feature two major elements of the tia system: the tia driver and the tia single-bore design.

Tia Driver
An open balanced armature speaker design for realistic resolution and transparency. By opening a balanced armature, the diaphragm becomes fully unobstructed, reducing resonance in the IEM and allowing sound to travel more naturally to the ear.

Tia Single Bore
A huge advancement in eliminating unwanted tube resonance. The large bore itself serves as a sound-shaping chamber and aids the tia high driver in delivering a linear and coherent frequency response. The short sound path provides remarkable high-frequency extension and smoothness. The large single bore also allows for easier maintenance.

64 Audio U12t

Apex

Apex, or Air Pressure Exchange, is a pneumatically interactive vent that releases air pressure in a sealed in the ear canal. Apex comes in two variations, m15 (-15dB) and m20 (-20dB).

Alleviate Listener Fatigue
When you seal a miniature speaker in an ear canal, the air inside becomes trapped. Apex relieves this air pressure, allowing the eardrum to move naturally, so you can comfortably listen longer.

Extend The Soundstage
Freely moving air extends the soundstage and provides a more natural listening experience. It also preserves bass frequencies and helps the listener distinguish individual instruments.

Hear Your Audience
Custom in-ear monitors provide amazing isolation and help you hear your mix more clearly and at lower volumes than a wedge monitor or earbuds. Apex lowers decibel levels while preserving the clarity of the sounds around you, so artists on stage can connect with their audience while protecting their hearing.

LID

LID, or Linear Impedance Design, enables a consistent, reliable sound regardless of what source. This proprietary circuit corrects the non-linear impedances of the drivers, restoring proper interaction with the source and preserving the desired sound signature. Whether you're a musician plugging into a variety of gear at different gigs or studios, or an audiophile listening from low-impedance sources, LID ensures your IEMs are delivering the desired sound signature consistently. And like all our IEMs, this model can be used with a wide range of personal audio devices as well as all hard-wired and wireless monitor systems.

64 Audio Buyer's Guide

Specs

Driver Type/Count Twelve precision balanced armature drivers
Driver Configuration 1 tia high, 1 high-mid, 6 mid, 4 low
Frequency Response 10Hz – 20kHz
Sensitivity 108db dB/mW
Impedance 12.6 +1/-2 Ω from 10Hz – 20kHz
Crossover Integrated 4-way passive crossover
Isolation -20dB w/ m20 module, -15dB w/ m15 module

In the Box

  • U12t Universal In-Ear Monitors
  • 64 Audio Premium Leather Case
  • TrueFidelity Eartips (S,M,L)
  • Silicone Eartips (S,M,L)
  • 48" Detachable Premium Cable
  • m20 apex Modules
  • m15 apex Modules
  • mX apex Modules
  • Round Sticker

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Customer Reviews

Based on 12 reviews
92%
(11)
8%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
P
Patrick
Well-Rounded

The U12t's do a great job at being well-rounded. I listen to these for multiple hours a day with no fatigue or discomfort.

L
Leonid Altgauzen

The team Bloomaudio great work

T
Tim L.
You get what you pay for…

And the case of the 64 Audio U12t it’s really true. You don’t need me to tell you about them, read any of the numerous reviews online. One of the best non-custom IEMs you can buy, supremely detailed, musical, and easy to enjoy over long listening sessions.

N
Neil S.
You'll be Happy

The hype is true (Precog, et. al.), this is a pure, detailed, and still somehow fun tuned iem. I wanted an all BA iem for my collection (I'll be downsizing soon, this is getting ridiculous), and Bloom recommended. I couldn't be happier. Now I toggle btwn. these, the UM MEST MK2, and the Solaris 2020 (and to be honest, I still rotate in my FiiO FH9s and FD7s). I'm primarily a classical music listener: complex and potentially congested symphonies and concerti: the U12t is unfazed, giving each section or instrument its due and spatial location. The tuning, like I said is still pleasing - never clinical. And that bass...how did they do it. I would never have known it was BA bass if I hadn't read it. Like I said, you'll be happy if you get them. And for the record, Bloom Audio is a real pleasure to work with: patient and knowledgeable.

J
Jlemaster1957
64 Audio U12T vs Monarch Mk2

I provided this review on request on Head-Fi and reproduce it here as it provides some context to an assessment of the 64 Audio U12T.

In terms of tangibles, I bought the U12T from Bloom new but at a reduced sale price with my own funds and all my impressions are my own.

The box in which U12T is black with a picture of the U12T on the cover, which opens book-style revealing the IEMs in a piece of protective foam and a cleaning brush and the non-installed M20 and MX apex modules on 1 side in a foam cut-out, with tips and cable in t e hockey puck style leather case on the other . Stock tips (larger silicones) are in fact Spin Fit Cp 145s, which fit me best). Foam tips are (proprietary?) very soft memory foam. I found they were not as isolating as Comply foams , but I don’t tend to use foams much so there you go. The black stock cable is supple with heat-shrink plastic to go over the ears and SE 3.5 mm termination on tbe other end. It works just l fine but I switched it out for. an Eletech Project 8 Fortitude with 2.5 mm balanced termination.

Both IEMs I am comparing were played via 4.4 mm balanced out from Hiby R8 with Turbo=on (my default). U12T had M15 apex module installed. Tracks are Fruhlingsgefuhle by Melokind, Magnetar by Mark Lettieri, Beldiya by Triplego, Twice by Ludovici Einaudi (Reimagined by Mercan Dede) and Lifted by Love by KD Lang. I used Azla Sedna Xelastic tips for the Mk2 and stock Spinfit CP 145s for the U12T - in both cases large size. Comfort was good on both though seal possibly a tiny bit better on the Mk2 as the Xelastics are well worn in. Mk2 has the stock cable, for U12T I use an Eletech Project 8 Fortitude (note well cable believers). I listened to each song alternatively with each set A/B before moving on to the next song.

Bass- Quantity in the sub-bass was good for both, but a bit more in U12T. Microdynamics (max bass to max blackness in between bass drops) was more pronounced on the U12T; having said that it's quite good on the Mk2. Transient attack and decay was a bit quicker on the U12T. When there were several bass instruments playing at the same time, there was more separation on the U12T between them. On the Mk2 there was less distinct separation between the bass lines. Bass did not bleed into mids with either set (both had good coherence between bass and mids). Having said all that, given it’s use of a dynamic driver for bass, I found the Mk2 bass more analog, more "realistic" with better impact across the range of bass instruments - on some tracks, U12T could be a bit "thunderous" i.e. when the large bass drops on "Twice" at about 1 min (this is in fact a good test passage for bass quality).

Mids were quite forward on the Mk2, in Beldiya at about 1:30 min there is a "purr-purr" that sounded like it was right in my ear. Vocals were more set back in the stage on the U12T, but were not less in quantity. On some passages, there seemed to be several different vocal lines - even more 'reverb' on the U12T as a result of the depth of stage.

Treble was much more forward, detailed and the details were more noticeable on the U12T. This was clear across every track. I could hear details on the U12T high up in the treble that were not retrieved at all on the Mk2, and treble quantity was less on the Mk2 as well. For instance, on the Melokind track I could hear some percussion details high up in the treble register that I could not pick out on the Mk2. Treble on the U12T was snappy, not sibliant/harsh and well extended.

In terms of staging and separation, the U12T has it in spades- instrument separation and in both width and depth are much greater than Mk2, and very clear. This was particularly noticeable in the upper mids to the top of the treble. Soundstage for the Mk2 is much more "inside the head" or at best 'helmet-like' but instrument separation was still good- everything is just closer and more intimate. Interestingly the center image is still good for both, just closer to me on the Mk2. Having said all that, there is a smoothness, a musicality, a coherence that is hard to beat on the Mk2. Everything "fits together" so very well. I think the set-back mids (especially on vocals) detracts from this sense of coherence on the U12T on some tracks.

Conclusion: This was a good thing to do. In my mind, I had pegged these 2 IEMs into the same space sonically and they aren't. U12T has much superior detail-retrieval, a wider-deeper sound stage, better instrument separation and great bass "for a BA set". Technically the U12T beats Mk2 by a fair margin (which it should it costs twice the price), but Mk2 comparably sounds very coherent, smooth, "warm" and musical especially for music that more tokens mid and sub bass like EDM (my typical /favoured genre), where the bass has a more natural, analog tone. "Treble-heads" will prefer the U12T every time, as will those more concerned about technicalities and texture vs quantity across the frequency response.’


Recently viewed